The Brief · Free access by invitation
Explore ten case studies across four European countries, based on real locations, historical imagery and geodata. See how CRI organises these sources for construction and collateral review.
For journalists, banking professionals, investors, partners and other interested visitors. Access to The Brief is always free.
Can’t find your invitation, or having trouble entering? Contact us at cri@3brain.ai.
These public summaries introduce the review question, source material and limits of each case. Full case records and the interactive walkthrough are available in The Brief with an invitation code.
Which building and scope does a milestone cover? Historical basemap.at imagery and OSM-derived orientation outlines place the Vienna district in context. They illustrate why the building and contractual scope must be established separately.
Which schedule version is the basis for the review? A basemap.at aerial view with a 2024 watermark and an OSM-derived working area provide site context. The case frames the need to link the review to a dated schedule; the image alone cannot identify that version.
Which dated sources support the milestone review? Aerial imagery from the Bavarian Surveying Administration, acquired on 24 August 2024, provides district context. The case illustrates the need to connect dated observations to the relevant milestone records.
What does the technical adviser’s review cover? Historical imagery from ČÚZK / Zeměměřický úřad and an OSM-derived orientation area provide context for the Prague site. The case distinguishes the area shown from the scope that the adviser must confirm.
Which parts of the review question does a response answer? Historical ČÚZK / Zeměměřický úřad imagery and an analyst-defined working area provide context for the Brno site. The example separates this source context from questions that still need a documented response.
Which access routes matter to the property review? A basemap.at aerial view with a 2022 watermark provides context for Bruck an der Leitha. The example shows why access routes and the relevant property boundary need separate confirmation.
How can the property’s review history stay traceable? Historical ČÚZK / Zeměměřický úřad imagery and an OSM-derived candidate building outline provide context for Kozomín / Úžice. The example frames traceable source references while keeping the candidate footprint distinct from a confirmed bank asset boundary.
Which project phase do the documents cover? A 2025 aerial mosaic from Beeldmateriaal Nederland / PDOK provides context for Merwede in Utrecht. The example distinguishes an orientation window from a verified project-phase boundary and the records needed to define it.
How can one unit be updated within a larger property record? The 2025 orthophoto layer from Beeldmateriaal Nederland / PDOK provides site context. The case frames the need for separate unit records; individual units are not mapped in this public orientation view.
Which records distinguish construction from operation? A 2025 orthophoto from Beeldmateriaal Nederland / PDOK and OSM-derived orientation geometry provide Rotterdam site context. Images can place physical structures in context; commissioning and operating status require separate records.
Historical imagery provides context; it does not certify contractual milestones, asset boundaries or operating status. The public case gallery lists source details and date limitations.
The Brief is available now. A separate CRI demonstrator is in final development, with a demonstration planned for October 2026. Institution-specific configuration, calibration and evaluation require an agreed scope and responsible human review.
The Brief is a free walkthrough. Each paid pilot is tailored to your cases and review needs. We agree the deliverables, any specialist advisory work and the total project budget before the pilot starts.
3BrainAI