3BrainAI

The Brief · Free access by invitation

Come inside the review.

Explore seven model situations for a bank review: the question, the evidence and the next human step.

Illustrative scenarios, not customer results. Plus ten case studies using real locations, historical imagery and geodata.

For journalists, banking professionals, investors, partners and other interested visitors. Access to The Brief is always free.

Browse the case studies View a public Evidence Pack

I have an access code.

Enter your invitation code. For a personal invitation, use the email address it was issued to.

Enter with my code

I’d like access.

Tell us who you are and what you would like to explore. We review requests and send invitations by email.

Request free access

Can’t find your invitation, or having trouble entering? Contact us at cri@3brain.ai.

Start with a public example.

Case study abstractsPublic case abstracts

These public summaries introduce the review question, source material and limits of each case. Full case records and the interactive walkthrough are available in The Brief with an invitation code.

VILLAGE IM DRITTEN

Which building and scope does a milestone cover? Historical basemap.at imagery and OSM-derived orientation outlines place the Vienna district in context. They illustrate why the building and contractual scope must be established separately.

Aspern

Which schedule version is the basis for the review? A basemap.at aerial view with a 2024 watermark and an OSM-derived working area provide site context. The case frames the need to link the review to a dated schedule; the image alone cannot identify that version.

Munich–Neufreimann

Which dated sources support the milestone review? Aerial imagery from the Bavarian Surveying Administration, acquired on 24 August 2024, provides district context. The case illustrates the need to connect dated observations to the relevant milestone records.

Smíchov City

What does the technical adviser’s review cover? Historical imagery from ČÚZK / Zeměměřický úřad and an OSM-derived orientation area provide context for the Prague site. The case distinguishes the area shown from the scope that the adviser must confirm.

Nová Zbrojovka

Which parts of the review question does a response answer? Historical ČÚZK / Zeměměřický úřad imagery and an analyst-defined working area provide context for the Brno site. The example separates this source context from questions that still need a documented response.

CTP Vienna East

Which access routes matter to the property review? A basemap.at aerial view with a 2022 watermark provides context for Bruck an der Leitha. The example shows why access routes and the relevant property boundary need separate confirmation.

Prague North

How can the property’s review history stay traceable? Historical ČÚZK / Zeměměřický úřad imagery and an OSM-derived candidate building outline provide context for Kozomín / Úžice. The example frames traceable source references while keeping the candidate footprint distinct from a confirmed bank asset boundary.

Merwede

Which project phase do the documents cover? A 2025 aerial mosaic from Beeldmateriaal Nederland / PDOK provides context for Merwede in Utrecht. The example distinguishes an orientation window from a verified project-phase boundary and the records needed to define it.

CTP Amsterdam

How can one unit be updated within a larger property record? The 2025 orthophoto layer from Beeldmateriaal Nederland / PDOK provides site context. The case frames the need for separate unit records; individual units are not mapped in this public orientation view.

Holland Hydrogen I

Which records distinguish construction from operation? A 2025 orthophoto from Beeldmateriaal Nederland / PDOK and OSM-derived orientation geometry provide Rotterdam site context. Images can place physical structures in context; commissioning and operating status require separate records.

Scope and availability

Historical imagery provides context; it does not certify contractual milestones, asset boundaries or operating status. The public case gallery lists source details and date limitations.

The public Evidence Pack and The Brief present prepared examples. The CRI demonstrator is in development. The functions available in a demonstration and the scope of any paid engagement are agreed separately. Specialist review remains part of the process.

The Brief is a free walkthrough. A first paid engagement starts with one property, an earlier report and a current review question. Scope, specialist involvement, price and delivery date are agreed before work begins. Any wider pilot is agreed separately.